Used to be, if you ran into a cute guy, you could get a clue as to which team he played for by whether or not he was wearing a wedding ring. Same went for girls. Then all those gay men and lesbian women started having significant relationships and started using the same kind of rings used by heterosexual couples. In the beginning, a lot of guys would wear the rings on their right hands (at least in public, because their co-workers would know that they weren't married, right?). But more and more, and especially since the same-sex marriage issue took center stage, everyone's wearing the same rings on the same hands (left).
It would be easier for me as I saunter through life trying to figure everyone out without having to actually engage them in anyway, if a few rules were observed.
First rule: If you're coupled, wear the ring on the left hand. I've heard that some European cultures wear their rings on the other (or right) hand. Do it the way you want at home. Do it that way here and you may get some unexpected opportunities, because I propose that if you're single but want to get married, you wear the ring on the right hand. Wouldn't that be cool. You know immediately if you should move in or hold back.
Now I know I'm going to get resistance with this line, but wouldn't it be even better if you sort of communicated your particular team by wearing a particular kind of ring on the right hand, sort of like the old handkerchief code used by Gay men in the 70s and 80s, only more tasteful and worn as a ring. Wouldn't that make shopping at Home Depot a lot more fun?
I don't know if any of you had the chance today to watch the California Supreme Court's oral arguments as to whether Mayor Gavin Newsom exceeded his authority when he invited Gay men and Lesbian women to come and get married at City Hall. Of course, he did. That's the part that we loved about it. The City Attorney charged with representing the City in front of the court today was Therese Stewart. Her job was not to win the Court over. The deck was stacked. She knew that, and you did too after about a minute of questioning. Her job was to make the mayor's actions seem reasonably plausible, and she did, too, with style and humor. And she's beautiful, in a mannish sort of way (wink, wink). When asked if the mayor was attempting to circumvent the judicial branch, she quipped, "If that was his plan it wasn't very successful."
Today's hearing was not about same-sex marriage, it was about whether the mayor could do what he did, and it appears the answer is no. There was a second argument going on which is much more difficult for the court. What to do with the 4,000 plus same-sex couples who have the right to believe in good faith that they are married? Let them bring 4,000 suits into the system each time they encounter a problem with their marriage's validity, or just pretend they do not exist because the mayor had no right to do what he did? The court's wrestling with that. Some want the mayor stripped naked and whipped for the audacity of his actions. Some want the couples to have their day in court. Win or lose, we've already won just by being here. When I first came out, Gay bars were illegal in about 45 of the states. There were sodomy laws on the books in about as many states, and the only place Gays felt any safety was in the state of anonymnity afforded in large, urban areas.
Fast forward 40 years, that's a lot of naked, gyrating bodies in lots of parades, several of which I was in, but -- be that as it may -- presently, there are same-sex marriages taking place all across Europe, Canada, even in the U.S., and domestic partner benefits are routinely offered in the most conservative of states because companies want smart and dynamic people and they don't care with whom they have sex. I'm on the winning side in this. My friend Bob and I agreed tonight that we'd just as soon this issue wait until after the election, but I reminded him that the two of us are single. Our rights weren't being affected, it was those couples who were raising kids or wanting to, or who had been with one another for over 50 years, -- those same-sex couples, who were fueling this movement, and by gosh and by golly, if it's that important to them, I'll stand with them and demand acknowledgement. This is not about me.
This is the direction of our cultural evolution. It doesn't have to be this week, or next week. It is the inevitable expansion of progressive thought, and that consciousness is expanding exponentially. My guru told me that when I encountered a wave of such cosmic proportions, that I should pretend I'm a surfer and ride the wave. Cowabunga!
Recent Comments